Back to Fight the Injustice

UPDATE: BACK WITH VENGEANCE

It's been a number of months since I have been blogging and now I am back to continue to support you in getting solicitor smart.

Why the break?

As in all matters where you are up against self-service and corrupt employees of the establishment, it is critical that the fight for truth doesn't become all consuming. Life goes on.

In addition, a break will no doubt lull those who have lied, cheated and abused the court system into thinking they are in the clear. How wrong they are.

Hannon and his cronies will be bought to account for their actions. These people are still out there practicing, no doubt inflicting suffering on more innocent people.

UPDATE ON PROCEEDINGS.....

...The Investigation into the company by the Public Interest Unit

Many months ago the Public Interest Unit of the Insolvency Services analysed and completed their review of my Company's records. I have been informed that they were satisfied with their investigation. We did nothing wrong and their review no doubt showed this.

The Public Interest Unit have taken no action against myself or any of the former directors of the company as they know we did nothing wrong. Yet, on the basis of the same information they have reviewed Hannon and his cronies:

• Froze the bank account of a former director


• Stated that criminal proceedings may be bought against the former directors


• Misled the court knowing the true facts


• Supported the lies of the Specter Partnership, the people who closed the company

However, and no doubt with the above in mind, the Public Interest Unit have not released to me their report. This report would no doubt backs up what I have always stated. I can only presume they are protecting their cronies! The Truth Hurts.

The release of the Report will demonstrate:

• Hannon lied again and again

• Hannon knowingly misled the High Court, Peterborough Crown Court, his boss and the Chief Executive Officer of the Insolvency Service

All the above know Hannon has misled them, yet they have done nothing - its appears that no one in the Insolvency Service has any respect for the truth

THE FAILURE TO RELEASE THE REPORT IS UNACCEPTABLE AND ONLY SERVES TO PROTECT THOSE WHO HAVE LIED.

...The Malicious Act of Someone Trying to Ruin the Innocent's Career

Someone from the Cambridge Insolvency Service where Hannon worked called the Company of a former director of Wilson Properties. At this company he is a senior director responsible for 35 staff. The Weasel from the Insolvency Service told one of his staff that he was going to be struck of as a director.

Who do we know at the Cambridge Office? Who has shown themselves to have no regard for the truth? Hannon for one.

I make no allegation, but someone in authority is lying yet again.

More updates to follow!

Solicitor Slayer

NEXT UPDATE ON ITS WAY

Been out of action for a few months - back with bang in the next week.

Check out the site then

Chapter 4: My Home Was Bugged!

Don't forget to read my previous Blog posts to learn more about A Hannon (Official Reciever, Cambridge) his superiors and bad solicitors!

The Bugging of my Home!

In July 2006 my home was bugged with four bugging devices, two in my office and two attached to the external phone lines.

I make no allegations about who bugged my home. BUT someone wanted to know what I said and did! Maybe someone doesn’t want the public to hear what I have to say!

The police visited my home and in direct responce to their questions I informed them that I was, was intending to, or had taken legal action against:

• Anthony Hannon, Official Reciever, Cambridge
• Citreon Wells (Joint Liquidators - M Mehta & M Phillips)
• The Insolvency Service
• The Department of Trade and Industry
• The Specter Partnership (solicitors)
• Buckles Solicitors
• Belmont Hansford Solicitors

The police subsequently informed me that that no crime had been committed.

The placing of the bugging devices
The bugs were placed by a couple pretending to be viewing my home as potential purchasers.

While the women attempted to distract me by talking about the cooker (!!), the man went back to look at the bathroom; instead I saw him sneaking into the office. Suspecting that they were up to no good, and when my e mail no longer worked, I searched the office and found two bugging devices: a microphone and a computer reader. Subsequent to this I found the two telephone taps.

The microphone
Hidden under the phone socket behind a curtain I found the small penny sized microphone (picture on right above). It was fixed to the wall by three thin wires, one of which had doubled back on itself. It is when I cut myself on this wire while searching that I saw this bug.

I discovered that the microphone is known as a ‘cat’ as when opened (picture above) this is what it looks like. I believe these are imported from the US and easily purchased in UK.

The computer reader
Attached to one of the hard drive ports on the back on my computer was what I believe is a key board reader, designed to read what you write and what web sites etc you access on your computer.

The phone bugs
Within the external phone box on the wall outside my flat (3rd floor), I found two phone taps attached to the phone wires. Made of a clear rubber materials they were about a quarter of the size of a stamp.

The 'buggers' were entertained by an evening of video pornography!
After finding the bugs at about 7.30pm (within an hour of them being placed!), I left them in place and ran a pornographic video on replay all night. That would have given them something to listen to!

Let me say it again, I make no allegation as to who bugged my home. But someone out there wants to know what I say and who I write to. Maybe someone doesn’t want me to tell my story, but whatever their reasons the fact remains: my home and privacy have been violated. Someone must be held to account!

Read more about my story below, follow my blog and you can reach your own conclusions.

Solicitor Slayer

Chapter 3: A HANNON'S Support for a Freezing Order

Hannon provides false and misleading information in support of an application to freeze a former Company Director's assets!

Hannon lied to me and the Treasury Solicitors by denying ever being consulted!

A one and a half page e mail is evidence that he lied and this and the correspondence from the Treasury solicitors confirming Hannon's lies will be posted on Monday!

Background

In July 2006, one of the Joint Liquidators from Citroen Wells applied for a Freezing Order to freeze all of the assets of one of the former Directors of the Company.

Freezing orders are right at the edge of a Judge’s jurisdiction and their purpose is surely to freeze the assets of money launderers and drug barons, not the innocent!

You would think that such an Order, obtained in closed court were there is no opportunity to defend yourself, would only be granted on the basis of factual and correct information. Not so.

In support of the freezing order, Hannon provided false and misleading financial information following a direct request from the Joint Liquidators for evidence in support of their application for the freezing order being sought against a former Company Director.

Hannon lies about being consulted
Yet, when I asked Hannon’s boss, N Latif, if he and Hannon knew anything about the freezing order I was informed that neither he or Hannon knew anything about it prior to my call, and that neither of them had supplied any information to the Joint Liquidators.

Further to this, and on asking the Treasury Solicitors if Hannon had supplied any information in support of the Freezing Order, they stated that they would consult with their client (Hannon). There then followed a letter stating that after consulting with their client, Hannon had confirmed that he had not been consulted.

However, upon receipt of this letter and after forwarding it to the solicitors acting for the Joint Liquidator, they wrote back attaching two e mails. One from the Joint Liquidator to Hannon (dated 27 July 2006) requesting information on the company finances in support of their application for the Freezing Order, and a one and a half page e mail from Hannon (dated 27 July 2006) in response to this request.

Hannon’s e mail in response, contained entirely false and misleading financial information that was used in the High Court:

- Hannon alleged that there were £350,000 of unexplained cash withdrawals with full knowledge of the fact that much of this was staff wages and other sums that were clearly accounted.

- Even after being informed at a meeting at the offices of the Insolvency Service in front of N Letif and two other staff members that he had double accounted a payment going out of the Company account of £50,000. Hannon with the knowledge of his boss and D Flynn at 21 Bloomsbury Street did not remove this sum from his figures.

- Hannon alleged that the Company owed their Bankers £600,000. He stated in his email that he had a letter confirming this and that he would forward that letter to the Joint Liquidators. The letter was never forwarded, nor has the letter been found in the files that were Hannon's possession. There is nothing to substantiate the extent of the sum he alleges was owed to the Company bankers.


Hannon lied about not being consulted. Hannon lied to the Treasury Solicitors saying that he had not been consulted. Hannon’s lies were used in the High Court.

D Flynn, the Treasury Solicitors and Hannon’s boss, N Latiff were all shown the evidence that Hannon had lied, yet no one has done anything about it.

A week after the freezing order was granted it was removed at the return hearing on the basis of the information provided being unsubstantiated.

Yet again Hannon has got away with lying to the detriment of the innocent, yet there is nothing anyone can do about it and his bosses, in their failure to act, do nothing but protect their own.

Solicitor Slayer

Update: Consipracy by the Civil Service or Just Arrogance?

Conspiracy by the Civil Service or just arrogance?

.....update on my continuing battle against the system .....

Background
At the recent hearing at the Peterborough Magistrates Court (considered in detail in Blog post dated 2 March), while under oath and under cross examination in the witness box, I have a suspicion that A Hannon, Official Receiver for the Cambrideshire region of the Insolvency Service, may have committed perjury when he claimed that his boss had instructed him to report the alleged incident committed by my son to the police.

Perjury?
Perjury is obviously a very serious allegation against an officer of the Court. With this in mind I contacted A Hannon’s superiors to ascertain the truth before formally reporting to the police that A Hannon may have been committed perjury.

Are Hannon's Superiors Protecting Him?

All I ever want, and all I expect is the truth.Yet, A Hannon’s superiors – N Latif, Regional Director, Cambridgeshire Region and D Flynn, Inspector General and Agency Chief Executive of the Insolvency Service - as well as the Treasury Solicitors, refuse to answer a very simple question ‘did they instruct A Hannon to report the alleged incident to the police as A Hannon claimed while under oath?’

In a written reply to my first letter, and no doubt in response to this question, N Latif wrote:

'Because of the serious nature of your assertions I will be writing to the court for a copy of the transcript of the hearing. Once I receive this I will be in a position to consider your comments in detail'.

Following Latif’s initial response I sent him, D Flynn and the Treasury Solicitors a letter from my son’s solicitor’s confirming the statement made by A Hannon in court.

Since sending this copy letter, on five occasions I have requested of N Latif, D Flynn and the Treasury Solicitors a simple yes or no as to whether A Hannon was telling the truth in the witness box. While the only response from the Treasury Solicitors has been an acknowledgement of one of my letters, I have recived a single reply from N Latif in which he stated that:

'He saw no reason why A Hannon should not have reported the incident to the police'.

A carefully written response written in such a way to avoid denying or accepting what was stated as truth by A Hannon in court? This response seems to me to be the type of wording advised by a solicitor. You can make your own mind up.

Most recently on 11 April, I wrote to all three parties stating that unless I receive a clear yes or no to my question by 5pm today, I would report the matter to the police. There has been no response from the Treasury Solicitors or N Latif. However, D Flynn replied stating:

'You have had a response from N Latif on this question and you must take whatever steps you consider appropriate'.

As an informed reader, in considering the above facts I am sure you can form your own opinion regarding the truth in this matter.

Reach your own conclusion
Whatever your conclusion, ask yourself two questions:

1. Why is it that a solicitor who acts on behalf of her Majesties Government, a Regional Director of the Insolvency Service and the Inspector General and Agency Chief Executive of the Insolvency Service refuse to answer a very simple question ‘was A Hannon instructed to report the alleged incident to the police as A Hannon claimed while under oath?’

2. Are the individuals concerned conspiring to pervert the course of justice?


Someone must hold these public servants to account and I am now left with no option but to formally report this matter to the police.

Watch this space!

Solicitor Slayer

Update: Did I expect Justice?

Hannon gets off!!

Background
At the High Court today the Judge dismissed my personal claim against A Hannon, the Official Receiver, and dismissed my application to amend my claim for misfaence in public office.

After hearing and seeing the evidence that showed beyond doubt that Hannon had:

Knowingly supplied incorrect information to the Courts

• Knowingly supplied incorrect information in support of an application to freeze a former-Directors assets
• Lied to the Peterborough Police resultant in my son being arrested, thrown in a cell and charged with threatening behaviour
• Lied in Court when giving evidence before this charge against my son was dropped
• Lied to his bosses and former directors of the Company

The Judge found that as an Official Receiver, Hannon was privileged and immune from prosecution.

Hannon can do and say what he likes and not be held accountable!

It is an outrage that this liar can inflict so much harm on people, lie to the very people he is meant to represent (the Courts) and be allowed to get away with it.

How can a man who has shown so little integrity and a total disrespect for the truth be allowed to do what he wants and be protected by the law. How many other people have suffered as a result of his lies?

I won't let this one rest and it is my intention to go public on this to warn others!

Solicitor Slayer

Update: High Court Hearing 21 March 2007

UPDATE - High Court Hearing on Tue 21 March - UPDATE - The fight goes on - UPDATE

Back off to the High Court in London to continue my battle against the DTI, Official Receiver (Anthony Hannon) and the Specter Partnership.

Standing up to the establishment! Fighting for our rights! Demanding a just, fair and equitable system!

Not a system where government officials can claim immunity from prosecution while:

• Knowingly misleading the Courts with knowledge of the true facts
• Deliberately misleading the police to get my son charges for threatening behaviour
• Misrepresenting the truth
• Ignoring the true facts
• Committing slander
• Abusing the process that is meant to protect innocent parties

Watch this space for the outcomes!

Solicitor Slayer

Chapter 2 - The Official Reciever of Cambridge cannot be trusted

What is an Official Receiver?
An Official Receiver is a person appointed by the Court to investigate the reasons for the winding up of a Company.

The Official Receiver's duties include protecting the interests of a Company's creditors as well as those of the general public. In this respect one of the Official Receiver's roles is to investigate the activities of a Company's former Directors to ensure that they acted properly in the running of a company, and to bring action against those who haven't which may include barring them from future Directorships.

Anthony Hannon
Anthony Hannon, Official Receiver for the Cambrideshire region of the Insolvency Service was appointed as the Official Receiver for my family business. As a number of the Company Director's were also creditors, we expected him to support us in our fight against the solicitors that wound my family business up. How wrong we were...

In my extensive dealings with Hannon he has shown that he cannot stand being challenged and he believes that he is always right, even in light of evidence that shows he is clearly wrong. When Hannon has made mistakes, he won't admit to them and he has shown a complete disregard for the truth. In my and the former Directors' view, Hannon gets some perverse pleasure from overseeing the full closure of a Company and I believe he has a personal loathing for me.

Indeed, since his appointment Hannon has shown himself to be dishonest; has knowingly misled to the former Directors of the Company, his employers and the Government solicitors; has provided information to the Courts that he knew was incorrect and misleading, and most damning of all Hannon has misled the Peterborough police and the Peterborough Magistrates Court in an attempt to get my son a criminal record for threatening behaviour.

Hannon gets my son arrested!!
Last week in the Peterborough Magistrates Court, charges bought against my son for allegedly threatening Hannon under s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 were dismissed.

These charges were bought by the Peterborough police after my son was arrested - and locked up in a police cell for six hours - on the basis of misleading and false statements made by Hannon and two of his work cronies.

Hannon falsely alleged that my son had threatened him. Although there were seven other witnesses to the alleged incident, the police only took statements from Hannon and hos two work cronies. My son did not threaten Hannon and he pleaded not guilty. I believe Hannon's false and unproven allegations were an attempt to get at me personally by attacking my family.

At the Court hearing, and only after reading the statements of Hannon and his cronies, hearing their conflicting and inconsistent evidence, and reading the statements and hearing the evidence of my son's witnesses, the District Judge dismissed the charges.

The actions of Hannon in making these false allegations was a clear and flagrant abuse of his position and it is is outrageous that this man still remains in his job.

Hannon has lied on other occasions
In the course of his duties Hannon has been shown to have lied on a number of occasions.

An example of Hannon lying: At a meeting attended by myself, his boss and colleagues (a meeting that was recorded), Hannon denied any knowledge of a loan repaid by the Company, the implication being that the Directors has spent the money. Following the meeting, when again challenged with the truth, Hannon confirmed in writing that he had checked his files and stood by his statement. However, Hannon had submitted correspondence clearly detailing the loan and its repayment to the Court a few weeks earlier. Hannon's bosses have done nothing about the fact that their employee lied to them.

Hannon's attempts to discredit a former Director
Hannon knowingly supplied information that led directly to the assets of a former Director being frozen using laws designed to freeze the assets of drug barons and terrorists.

Following a request for information, amongst other misleading information, Hannon stated that £450,000 of my Company's funds remained unaccounted for, even though he had documents detailing where much of this money was spent. This information was then used at a closed hearing in the High Court in support of a freezing order, that froze all the assets, including the bank account, of a former Director. The freezing order was discharged 10 days later when the former Director was able to defend himslef in the High Court. When Hannon was asked if he had supplied any information in support of the order, the Government's solicitors (on behalf of Hannon) stated that Hannon had not been consulted. Subsequent to this I was provided with a copy of a two page e mail generated by hannon to support the freezing order.

Yet again Hannon lied, not opnly to us, but also to the Government Solicitors. This man has absolutely no integrity.

Hannon's bosses do nothing to protect people from Hannon
Even in light of a mass of evidence that Hannon has misled all parties involved, Hannon, an appointee of the Court, is still acting.

It is a scandal that someone who is immune from prosecution can get away with misleading the Courts, lying to the police and attempting to pervert the course of justice.

This is just another example of how a system designed to protect the public, does nothing but protect those we all believe should be upholders of the law.

Hannon must be removed from office before he can inflict damage on any other innocent parties!

If you have had any dealings with Hannon, contact me for more infomation on the actions of this man.

Solicitor Slayer

Chapter 1. Buckles Solicitors, Peterborough

My home was bugged.

See the evidence @ www.justice4you.co.uk

I make no allegations as to who invaded my privacy. Follow my Blog and reach your own conclusion.

Buckles Solicitors of Peterborough allowed my family owned and run business to pay £400,000 for a plot of land while knowing that some of the land was not in the ownership of the seller. I took the to Court and after 18 months they settled out of Court for over £300,000. Guilty or what! Before they paid out they denied they acted wrongly and I had to lay of eight staff including my two sons, my daughter and my brother. Avoid Buckles Solicitors and all costs, they have demonstrated that they can't be trusted to do a proper job!

Solicitor Slayer

Solicitors to avoid - "Get Solicitor Smart!"

My home was bugged.

See the evidence @ www.justice4you.co.uk
I make no allegations as to who invaded my privacy. Follow my Blog and reach your own conclusion.

Staff from the firms of solicitors named below are just a few that have abused their position and caused me, my family and work colleagues suffering and loss.

I have compelling evidence against them all. Over the coming months I will tell you more about them through my Blog. Look out for the postings with their names.

• The Specter Partnership (Liverpool and London)



• Buckles Solicitors (Peterborough)



• Mills and Reeves Solicitors (Cambridge)



• Belmont Hansford Solicitors (London)

Solicitor Slayer

Background to my story

My home was bugged.

See the evidence @ www.justice4you.co.uk

I make no allegations as to who invaded my privacy. Follow my Blog and reach your own conclusion.

MY COMPANY
I used to own a family run and managed construction business called Wilson Properties UK Ltd. The family business converted old barns into homes.

In July 2006, a firm of lying solicitors called the Specter Partnership wound up my family business in pursuit of an alleged debt of over £50,000.

When Specter were appointed on 24 September 2005 to support me in my battle against another set of lying solicitors (Buckles Solicitors) they estimated their costs to be between £20,000 - £25,000 (for a period that was likely to be about 6-8 months).

LYING SOLICITORS
After the Specter Partnership were sacked in December 2005 they presented a bill for £62,000 for just over 10 weeks work. They also claimed that they were appointed on 2 August 2005 to try to justify their inflated costs. They lied about the extent of the bill and they lied about their date of appointment.

SPECTER DESTROYED MY FAMILY'S BUSINESS
My company disputed the bill and the Specter Partnership wound up my Company putting eight people out of a work. Some of us lost our homes and we lost over a million pound of investment.

SPECTER LIED TO US, MISLED THE COURT AND THEY CONTINUE TO LIE
In the process of destroying my family business the Specter Partnership lied to us, misled the Court, withheld critical documents from us and the Court, and until this date they still continue to lie to all involved.

I would not be blackmailed by the Specter Partnership into paying their inflated costs and I have been fighting the system ever since. In my fight I have uncovered a system that is self- serving and self-protecting, while the Specter Partnership go unpunished for their actions.

FAILURE OF SYSTEM TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT
Following the winding up of my family business, the people and departments appointed to manage the closure of the company include the Official Receiver of Cambridge, The Joint Liquidators and the Insolvency Service. All of them have done nothing to hold the Specter Partnership to account.

In fact, many of those involved in this unbelievable story of incompetence and deceit, have lied on many occasions, yet no one will do anything about it.

The Courts and Judges who have heard this and associated claims have done nothing.

MY BLOG

• Will expose all those who have failed to protect me, my family and the Company investors and shareholders.

• Will expose other solicitors who have misled and lied to their client.

• Will show how the legal system has failed us and could fail you.

GET SOLICITOR SMART!
I hope my Blog will help educate you on how you can protect yourself, your family and your friends from the actions of some solicitors and a system that fails to hold them and associated professionals to account.

TELLING MY STORY
Over the coming months I will post details of what happened to my family business, while updating my visitors on my ongoing battle against the system.

Solicitor Slayer

What's my Blog all about - "Get Solicitor Smart!"

This Blog has been set up to tell my unbelievable story and to warn the public about the activities of named solicitors and other associated professionals. By reading my Blog I hope that you, your family and friends won't have to suffer as a result of their actions.

My home was bugged!! Someone doesn't want me to tell my story and my home was bugged with a microphone, a computer key board reader (above) and both my phones were tapped (for more bug pictures - visit www.justice4you.co.uk).

I will not be intimidated and I make no allegations as to who invaded my privacy. Follow my Blog and reach your own conclusion.

However, I will tell my story to expose the practices of named solicitors and associated professionals. I will give you evidence that proves beyond doubt that staff at some of the UK's best known legal firms' are using misleading and fradulant practices that mislead the courts and protect themselves and their companies.

My story is not all about solicitors. It also includes an Officer of the Court, employees of one of the country's largest accountancy firms and numerous Judges. These people have not acted on evidence before them, and the Officer of the Court has lied and lied again. No one is immune from the actions of some solicitors. We all have to use solicitors and we turn to them in the belief that they will uphold the rule of law. My story confirms that named solicitors have abused their professional position and knowledge of the legal system while showing how associated professionals and the Courts have failed to act to protect the innocent.

Follow my Blog, hear my story and "Get Solicitor Smart!"

Solicitor Slayer