
The Solicitor Who Destroyed my Business
Ken Specter of the Specter Partnership.
Need I say more!
If you have forgotten why this solicitor can't be trusted, check out the copy below
A public interest site that exposes the malpractice of named solicitors and associated professionals. For too long some solicitors have been able to abuse their clients and the system. Yet no one seems to care. It's time for change! By telling my story I hope to educate the public on what really goes on. Reading my Blog may even help you protect yourself, your family and friends from a system that has failed to protect the innocent.
Blogg Update
And here is the Barrister James Couser.
On his website he states:
"He has particular expertise in the field of asset recovery following liquidation, and insolvency practitioners and solicitors acting for creditors regularly instruct him in respect of these and related matters"
However, my family business was wound up in July 2005, and James has been representing his clients, the Joint Liquidators, since then.
It's now March 2009 and Couser has obtained nothing for the creditors he claims to act in the interests of, while ignoring the fact that the Director he continues to pursue is a major creditors. All he has done is incurr costs.
More on Couser soon
Lies, Lies and More Lies
how the legal can fail to protect the innocent
the true story of how the British legal system does nothing but protect its own
If you would like a pre-print edition of my book, I would be delighted to share it will you.
Be assured that every damning exposure and allegation I make in Lies, Lies and More Lies will be backed up by original documents I have in my possession from the likes of The Specter Partnership (solicitors), Anthony Hannon (official Receiver), The Insolvency Service, The Department of Trade and Industry; and Citroen Wells for whom both Phillips and Mehta represent. Their exposure will be for the benefit of thousands of people.
We are in the grip of the recession and as more businesses go under, the blood sucking antics of the Insolvency Service and Liquidators will be exposed.
WARNING: Take it from me, if your business goes into insolvency, the Joint Liquidators will do anything, absolutely anything to try to breach your limited company protection. The are all about their money and they will go to great lengths to prove you acted inappropriately when you ran your business. And so goes your Limited Company protection. The bloodsuckers will go for everything you have - your home, savings, pensions. They will stop at nothing if they think they have a chance of getting money from someone who has already lost everything they worked for.
Think Back: AS a business, did you have ever received a statutory demand. Did you know that this form failed to detail your legal rights of responce as is the law, and it therefore denied you your human rights. The powers that be (e.g DTI, Insolvency service, Government solicitors) know this, and they will do everything they can to deny accountability and prevent the truth coming out.
But they are accountable and many good businesses would still be trading if it was not for their failure. I am leading the charge on this. The nature of British law is that it has to be challenged; only through this can more just laws be created. I am currently taking my claims to the European Court of Human Rights.
If found in my favour, the consequences for the Government will be huge. Not only will 1,000s of Directors have been denied their human and legal rights on the basis of an illegal and morally flawed statutory demand form, but many companies will have gone under as the result of government failure; with all the untold suffering this causes employers and employees, their family.
Rest assured, it won't be long before the government will be held to account!
As a final note - there is some some very interesting information regarding James Couser (Barrister), a Barrister for whom it can be proven unprofessional, inappropriate and potentially illegal activity. Watch this space...
Be back soon, so hold in there.
Solicitor slayer
...The Investigation into the company by the Public Interest Unit
Many months ago the Public Interest Unit of the Insolvency Services analysed and completed their review of my Company's records. I have been informed that they were satisfied with their investigation. We did nothing wrong and their review no doubt showed this.
The Public Interest Unit have taken no action against myself or any of the former directors of the company as they know we did nothing wrong. Yet, on the basis of the same information they have reviewed Hannon and his cronies:...The Malicious Act of Someone Trying to Ruin the Innocent's Career
Don't forget to read my previous Blog posts to learn more about A Hannon (Official Reciever, Cambridge) his superiors and bad solicitors!
The Bugging of my Home!
In July 2006 my home was bugged with four bugging devices, two in my office and two attached to the external phone lines.
I make no allegations about who bugged my home. BUT someone wanted to know what I said and did! Maybe someone doesn’t want the public to hear what I have to say!
The police visited my home and in direct responce to their questions I informed them that I was, was intending to, or had taken legal action against:
The police subsequently informed me that that no crime had been committed.
The placing of the bugging devices
The bugs were placed by a couple pretending to be viewing my home as potential purchasers.
While the women attempted to distract me by talking about the cooker (!!), the man went back to look at the bathroom; instead I saw him sneaking into the office. Suspecting that they were up to no good, and when my e mail no longer worked, I searched the office and found two bugging devices: a microphone and a computer reader. Subsequent to this I found the two telephone taps.
The microphone
Hidden under the phone socket behind a curtain I found the small penny sized microphone (picture on right above). It was fixed to the wall by three thin wires, one of which had doubled back on itself. It is when I cut myself on this wire while searching that I saw this bug.
I discovered that the microphone is known as a ‘cat’ as when opened (picture above) this is what it looks like. I believe these are imported from the US and easily purchased in UK.
The computer reader
Attached to one of the hard drive ports on the back on my computer was what I believe is a key board reader, designed to read what you write and what web sites etc you access on your computer.
The phone bugs
Within the external phone box on the wall outside my flat (3rd floor), I found two phone taps attached to the phone wires. Made of a clear rubber materials they were about a quarter of the size of a stamp.
The 'buggers' were entertained by an evening of video pornography!
After finding the bugs at about 7.30pm (within an hour of them being placed!), I left them in place and ran a pornographic video on replay all night. That would have given them something to listen to!
Let me say it again, I make no allegation as to who bugged my home. But someone out there wants to know what I say and who I write to. Maybe someone doesn’t want me to tell my story, but whatever their reasons the fact remains: my home and privacy have been violated. Someone must be held to account!
Read more about my story below, follow my blog and you can reach your own conclusions.
Solicitor Slayer
Background
In July 2006, one of the Joint Liquidators from Citroen Wells applied for a Freezing Order to freeze all of the assets of one of the former Directors of the Company.
Freezing orders are right at the edge of a Judge’s jurisdiction and their purpose is surely to freeze the assets of money launderers and drug barons, not the innocent!
You would think that such an Order, obtained in closed court were there is no opportunity to defend yourself, would only be granted on the basis of factual and correct information. Not so.
In support of the freezing order, Hannon provided false and misleading financial information following a direct request from the Joint Liquidators for evidence in support of their application for the freezing order being sought against a former Company Director.
Hannon lies about being consulted
Yet, when I asked Hannon’s boss, N Latif, if he and Hannon knew anything about the freezing order I was informed that neither he or Hannon knew anything about it prior to my call, and that neither of them had supplied any information to the Joint Liquidators.
Further to this, and on asking the Treasury Solicitors if Hannon had supplied any information in support of the Freezing Order, they stated that they would consult with their client (Hannon). There then followed a letter stating that after consulting with their client, Hannon had confirmed that he had not been consulted.
However, upon receipt of this letter and after forwarding it to the solicitors acting for the Joint Liquidator, they wrote back attaching two e mails. One from the Joint Liquidator to Hannon (dated 27 July 2006) requesting information on the company finances in support of their application for the Freezing Order, and a one and a half page e mail from Hannon (dated 27 July 2006) in response to this request.
Hannon’s e mail in response, contained entirely false and misleading financial information that was used in the High Court:
- Hannon alleged that there were £350,000 of unexplained cash withdrawals with full knowledge of the fact that much of this was staff wages and other sums that were clearly accounted.
- Even after being informed at a meeting at the offices of the Insolvency Service in front of N Letif and two other staff members that he had double accounted a payment going out of the Company account of £50,000. Hannon with the knowledge of his boss and D Flynn at 21 Bloomsbury Street did not remove this sum from his figures.
- Hannon alleged that the Company owed their Bankers £600,000. He stated in his email that he had a letter confirming this and that he would forward that letter to the Joint Liquidators. The letter was never forwarded, nor has the letter been found in the files that were Hannon's possession. There is nothing to substantiate the extent of the sum he alleges was owed to the Company bankers.
Hannon lied about not being consulted. Hannon lied to the Treasury Solicitors saying that he had not been consulted. Hannon’s lies were used in the High Court.
D Flynn, the Treasury Solicitors and Hannon’s boss, N Latiff were all shown the evidence that Hannon had lied, yet no one has done anything about it.
A week after the freezing order was granted it was removed at the return hearing on the basis of the information provided being unsubstantiated.
Background
At the High Court today the Judge dismissed my personal claim against A Hannon, the Official Receiver, and dismissed my application to amend my claim for misfaence in public office.
After hearing and seeing the evidence that showed beyond doubt that Hannon had:
Knowingly supplied incorrect information to the Courts